J-Walking

Has anyone read The Shack?

If so, what were your thoughts?

Very interesting little MTV interview with pop sensation Katy Perry - of "I Kissed a Girl" and "Ur So Gay" fame. It seems she was once Katy Hudson, Christian recording artist.

Twice in the last 48 hours God has winked at me. They were wry little winks - ones of the sort that I might normally miss.

This evening a friend who I haven't heard from in months and months texted me and said I'd been on his heart and that "Our Papa" put me there. This afternoon I thought of my friend and two nights ago he was in a dream I had - first one I ever remember him guest starring in - and last night I picked up The Shack, the little book that is making referring to God as "Papa" all the rage.

This evening, another conversation with another friend was deeply encouraging to me. She referenced a particular book that proved to be very helpful in helping me develop a book project I'm considering.

Little things. Tiny things. Things certainly explainable by chance or quarks or quacks. But things too that have the distinct feel of winks from God. It is all a matter a choice really. Do I choose to believe that God winks? Or do I choose to believe everything is a matter of science and that's that. I choose winks no matter how naive or how much of a simpleton that might make me.

Several months ago - around the time I stopped blogging with any regularity - someone accused me of being the devil. And if it wasn't the devil, then it was certainly one of his minions. It is hard to shake off that sort of thing - especially when it centers around your writing and comes from a friend.

The accusation was that I had exploited some of the children in my writing about Uganda. My friend said that I was using their plight as a way of getting more people to read my blog - that my selfishness knew no ends, not even the exploitation of sick Ugandan children.

This friend is occasionally manic and has leveled somewhat outrageous charges against me and Kim at various points in our lives. Nevertheless, a charge like the one being leveled against me was both serious and sobering. It shut down my writing. Suffice it to say that exploiting the children I'd seen in Uganda had been the furthest thing from my heart or mind when I was writing about that experience. Indeed my hope was that the plight of these children would stir others to action - sponsoring a child through Compassion International, for instance.

All that said, however, I've had to - and continue to - reflect on the accusations, reflect on my own heart in writing those posts, other posts and everything else that I've written. I can't say that I've had any particular profound insights. I suppose my heart and my motivations on any given topic will always be a murky mixture of good, bad, and unclear. I suppose that is just the nature of life. I hope that my stuttering walk with Jesus makes that mixture ever clearer, ever purer, and ever more alive. But that is the kind of thing I can only see moment by moment, word by word. And to do that means I've got to write... I will.

How different are they? Really? James Dobson and Barack Obama?

On the face of it there is little, save their shared humanity, that seems to unite the two men. From their skin color to their positions on abortion, gay marriage, poverty, the role of government, from their views on the separation of church and state to their positions on the Iraq War, the men are about as far apart as men can get.

But appearances are deceiving. The men are actually very, very similar. (And this goes beyond their common love of basketball).

Both men see their religious faith as one of their primary political weapons. They take that faith and move in opposite directions, but their philosophy, their spirituality is very similar.

Dr. Dobson attacked Sen. Obama for having a flawed view - a deliberately skewed view - of Biblical theology "deliberately distorting the Bible," "dragging biblical understanding through the gutter," "willfully trying to confuse people," and having a "fruitcake interpretation of the Constitution." Obama responded by saying Dobson either hadn't read his speech (at a Sojourners event on poverty) or was just trying to score political points.

That back and forth, however, is simply the exchange of men who long ago decided that their faith was a tool for material ends.

It is a common mistake, a common temptation - the temptation to take the very hard work of the spiritual life - living humbly, loving your enemies, putting others first, forgiving always - and replace it with the easy work of politics - the promise that this policy or plan will bring about a sort of spiritual nirvana.

That is what unites Obama and Dobson. That they take those politics in different directions is incidental.

Dear Readers-- Due to a planned technical upgrade taking place on Wednesday June 11th, the Beliefnet Blogs will not display any new content, and commenting will be disabled. We aim to be back up and running by the end of...

» Continue Reading This Post

Even though I'm a Mac guy, here's a Windows take on Barack Obama. He is the 'ctrl-alt-del' candidate. He is the guy people are looking to restart, reboot, Washington DC and all that it has come to symbolize. It...

» Continue Reading This Post

I understand - in a small way - what it is like to come out of the closet. I say that because I feel like I have to continually come out of the closet and say, "Hey, wait, I'm...

» Continue Reading This Post

This is not a time to get weepy or maudlin about Sen. Kennedy. He really has just begun to fight. I know what I'm talking about. Five years ago, in the earliest hours of Palm Sunday morning, a doctor informed...

» Continue Reading This Post

And now there is our friend Peter Ahlstrom: I’ve read your blog daily for about a year, and occasionally commented. Tempting Faith got me started. You caught my interest with your stand on helping the poor, and on fasting...

» Continue Reading This Post